Get some popcorn and kick your feet up and enjoy. :laugh:
Old School brings up the other side of the equation. As with insurance policies you buy cheap cheap and don't get the coverage. Something happens you expect to be covered like the people who pay for the coverage. Buy cheap roofing contractors you are at a huge risk of being ripped off. Not even mentioned in report. B) :) :) B) Deep Down In Florida Where The Sun Shines Damn Near Every Day
We all understand what the reporter was looking for. The agenda was to provide an overview of ethical issues and considerations relevant to the use of exposure of shoddy contractors . It can be argued .The degree to which the ethical issues become problematic is in implementing exposure. It is largely dependent upon the ability of the correspondent to create a professional and objective context.I see a very biased context. Lumping every roofer in the rip off category. What is needed is a specific strategy for avoiding potential ethical conflicts in the reporting. Sensationalist journalism is not the answer. I live in a heavily regulated, licensed state. Regulations change nothing as far as rip offs go. Licensing gives more money for bureaucrats to spend. I doesn't change the moral ethical issues people on both sides of this issue have to deal with. B) :) :) B) Deep Down In Florida Where The Sun Shines Damn Near Every Day
Went to site, the video will not play