FOAM ROOFING

wywoody wrote: [quote]This ain't my pissin match, so I've avoided the conflict. But I'm snowed in and drinking coffee so it's time to piss. Blaming the shuttle disastor on the foam is like blaming the WTC collapse on jet fuel (get the irony, t>>>

[quote]This does not account for invariably trashing a roofing system that is completely viable simnply because a lack of understanding of it.

First off, this thread had pretty much run its course and died away...until ol' Aaron decided to recuc>>>

[quote]That was a severely retarded comment. Does a modified bitumen roof that needs a recoat every 3-5 years to make it the warranted 15 not make it a 15 year roof?

That's apples and oranges. A mod bit will survive just fine if you don't reco>>>

Roofguy wrote: [quote]Additionally, you may think it's just happenstance that the top 5 threads account for 370 posts, the vast majority of which, and by far the highest interest in, has been the contentious threads. Lively debate is good for a fo>>>

Roofguy wrote: [quote][quote]1. I think Tom came here because I posted a link to the TPO thread at NRG. I think he saw this and had to chime in. I haven't asked him, that's just my opinion.

I think you're being very generous.

[quote>>>

JET wrote: [quote][Don't be so defensive, you didn't invent the stuff, only sold it. I never blamed you for the NASA deaths due to this stuff failing, did I?

JET[/quote]

THats an iognorant comment. The space shuttle did not explode due to the>>>

Roofguy wrote: [quote]

Lastly, is a roof system that requires recoating every 10-15 years really a 30 year old roof? That's like saying a Chevy pickup can last 400,000 miles...but the engine needs rebuilt at 100,000.

That was a severely>>>

Oh never mind.

:silly:>>>

so................. this is what happens when roofers forums allow manufacturer's reps to batter each other after taking too much geritol.

My synopsis of this is ; accusations of deceptive marketing statements by two seperate but competing roofing sy>>>

Additionally, you may think it's just happenstance that the top 5 threads account for 370 posts, the vast majority of which, and by far the highest interest in, has been the contentious threads. Lively debate is good for a forum - it's been quite some t>>>

[quote]1. I think Tom came here because I posted a link to the TPO thread at NRG. I think he saw this and had to chime in. I haven't asked him, that's just my opinion.

I think you're being very generous.

[quote]3. The only people trashing>>>

Personally, Tim, I'm not too sure I agree with your assessments.

1. I think Tom came here because I posted a link to the TPO thread at NRG. I think he saw this and had to chime in. I haven't asked him, that's just my opinion.

2. I think his first>>>

theroofinggod wrote: [quote]Tom came here to help the guy interested in foam,not to trade jabs with carwashguy,you must be happy that he won`t post here again,pretty stupid maneuver

Tom came here for one reason and one reason only, and it>>>

Mike H wrote: [quote]Ahaaa.

So, we're right back to this........

from page 1 "It has a high cost of entry with equipment. Has perhaps the biggest learning curve of any one roofing product. Is EXTREMELY sensitive to environmental conditions for>>>

Ahaaa.

So, we're right back to this........

from page 1 "It has a high cost of entry with equipment. Has perhaps the biggest learning curve of any one roofing product. Is EXTREMELY sensitive to environmental conditions for proper application.

Instal>>>