English
English
Español
Français

Sign Up for Our E-News!

Join over 18,000 other roofers who get the Week in Roofing for a recap of this week's best industry posts!

Sign Up
Cougar Paws - Sidebar Ad - The Tool You Wear Gif
CRRC - Annual Meeting Registration 2024 = Sidebar Ad
NFBA - Sidebar Ad - Accredited Builder
Geocel - Sidebar - 50th Anniversary - Feb 2024
Bitec - StrongHold Sidebar Ad
McCormack Succession and Exit Planning - Sidebar Register
RoofersCoffeeShop - Where The Industry Meets!
English
English
Español
Français

Products Claiming Energy-Saving Abilities Must Have Scientific Backing

NRCA Energy-Saving Products
August 23, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.

By National Roofing Contractors Association. 

The FTC is suing companies for deceptive energy-saving statements. 

Four companies were recently sued by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for deceptive statements about their product’s energy-saving and insulative properties. These companies sell paint products used as roof coatings and more information on the complaints and other similar cases can be found on the FTC’s energy-savings scams page.   

In complaints filed in federal court, the FTC charged the companies with falsely overstating the R-value ratings of the coatings, making deceptive statements about heat flow and insulating power. 

“Companies touting the energy-saving properties of their products must have scientific support for their claims,” said Andrew Smith, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “When they don’t, the FTC will step in to make sure they do.” 

The FTC filed complaints against the following four companies: 

  • The FTC’s complaint against Superior Products International II Inc. alleges it markets its Super Therm and Sunshield roof and wall coatings using deceptive energy-savings and R-value claims. The complaint states the defendants falsely claim the products provide significant energy savings of “between 40% and 70%” for consumers when applied to a home or other building. The FTC also says the defendants are unable to substantiate the claim that the products have an R-value (or equivalency) of R-19 when they have an R-value of less than one. 

  • The FTC’s complaint against SuperTherm Inc. alleges it markets MultiCeramics Insulation coating using deceptive R-value claims, falsely stating the product provides the equivalent of R-19 insulation when it has an R-value of less than one. 

  • The FTC’s complaint against SPM Thermo-Shield Inc. alleges they deceptively market their Thermo-Shield Roof Coat, among other products, as having R-values of R-22 and R-21, and they provide significant energy savings for consumers. The complaint states these R-value claims are false and the coatings have R-values lower than one. Additionally, the defendants cannot substantiate their energy-savings claims. 

  • The FTC’s complaint against F & G International Group Holdings LLC and FG International LLC alleges they market their FGI-4440 Insulation Coating using deceptive R-value claims, claiming the product provides “an equivalent R value greater than 30” when FGI-4440 has an actual R-value of less than one. The FTC also alleges the defendants falsely claim testing supports their R-value claims. 

Learn more about NRCA in their RoofersCoffeeShop® Directory.  

Original article source: NRCA 



Recommended For You


Comments

There are currently no comments here.

Leave a Reply

Commenting is only accessible to RCS users.

Have an account? Login to leave a comment!


Sign In
EagleView Assess -  Banner Ad - Visualizer
English
English
Español
Français

Sign Up for Our E-News!

Join over 18,000 other roofers who get the Week in Roofing for a recap of this week's best industry posts!

Sign Up
DaVinci - Sidebar Ad - New Choice For Traditional Beauty
Cougar Paws - Sidebar Ad - The Tool You Wear Gif
Bitec - StrongHold Sidebar Ad
MetalForming - Lunch & Learn
ICP - Sidebar Ad - APOC Professional Protection
Roofle - Sidebar Ad - RoofQuote Pro