Translate
Default
English
Español
Français

User Access


Sign up for Week in Outdoors eNews!
Reworked.AI -  - May
Roof Hugger - Q3 -
RCMA -  - Contractor Membership
Wil-Mar -  - March2026
Project Map It -  Ad - Close More Roofing Jobs With Project Map It
NFBA -  Ad - Accredited Builder
Translate
Default
English
Español
Français

Irregular Seams Resulting from Manufacturing Process

« Back To Observations from the Field
Author
Posts
August 28, 2024 at 12:12 a.m.

HannahFord7

Issue: During an initial inspection, Benchmark identified irregular seams on a single-ply roof, which could potentially lead to leaks and other issues if left unaddressed. To ensure a thorough evaluation, Benchmark requested that the roof membrane manufacturer conduct an on-site assessment of the membrane seams. This step was crucial to determine the necessary repairs or replacements needed to maintain the roof's integrity and prevent future problems.

August 28, 2024 at 12:14 a.m.

HannahFord7

From the Benchmark Blog:

Benchmark Service:Evaluation Services

Solution: The Single-Ply Manufacturer visited the site and determined that the membrane was incorrectly trimmed during the production process, which resulted in it not meeting the necessary specifications for proper installation. Consequently, it should not have been installed by the Contractor. Recognizing the severity of this error, the Manufacturer took immediate action and hired a specialized roofing contractor to strip in approximately 10,000 linear feet of roof membrane seams to rectify the issue. This extensive repair work ensured that the roof would meet the required standards and provide the necessary protection. As a result of the Manufacturer's responsibility and swift action, the Client received $45,000 worth of repairs at no cost to the facility.

Possible Impact: Had these irregular seams gone unnoticed and unaddressed, the facility would likely have faced significant consequences. Water leaks from the compromised roof could have caused substantial interior damage, including mold growth and structural deterioration. This situation would have incurred considerable repair costs and disrupted facility operations, potentially leading to revenue loss and reputational harm. Moreover, prolonged water exposure could have damaged sensitive equipment, necessitating costly replacements or repairs. Therefore, the prompt identification and rectification of the issue by Benchmark and the Manufacturer safeguarded the facility from these adverse outcomes.

Learn more about Benchmark from their RCS Directory Or visit their "Observations from the Field" blog.


« Back To Observations from the Field
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

QXO - Banner Ad -  Enjoy Spring Savings with QXO and James Hardie
Translate
Default
English
Español
Français

User Access


Sign up for Week in Outdoors eNews!
Gaco -  Ad - Restore Smarter to Protect Longer (U95)
BITEC -  - Stronghold
Anchor Products -  Ad - Newsletter April
ABC Supply -  - Deliver Success
Van Mark Products -  Ad - June-Jul2026 Rebates
Brava - PRO Portal -