Translate
Default
English
Español
Français

Sign Up for Our E-News!

Join over 18,000 other roofers who get the Week in Roofing for a recap of this week's best industry posts!

Sign Up
SRS -  Ad (En Espanol Page) - Roof Hub
NFBA -  Ad - Accredited Builder
Reworked.AI -  - May
PEPA -  Ad - Modern Materials Made to Last
RCMA -  - Contractor Membership
Sign up for Week in Outdoors eNews!
Translate
Default
English
Español
Français

A View from The Hill - Political News: The Regulatory Fire Continues

Post - View from The Hill
September 19, 2016 at 4:06 p.m.

WSRCA Membership offers legislative benefits

Western States Roofing Contractors Association continues to provide important information through their membership opportunities. If you are interested in learning more about current Silica rulings, consider becoming a member of WSRCA. We are pleased to offer an initial excerpt from Craig Brightup concerning recent legislation and regulations. This type of information is consistently offered through WSRCA membership.

By Craig Brightup, The Brightup Group LLC The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Fed-OSHA) issued its “Occupational Exposure to Crystalline Silica” rule on March 25 of this year effective June 23, but the rule’s requirements for construction don’t start until June 23, 2017, and a year later for manufacturing. Regardless, OSHA state-plans certified by Fed-OSHA to enforce workplace safety regulations that must be “as effective” as federal regulations have to consider whether to adopt the silica rule including California’s (Cal-OSHA). On August 18, California’s Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board held a hearing regarding adoption of the federal silica rule (Construction and General Industry Safety Orders; New Sections 1532.3, 5204, and existing Section 5155; Published on July 1, 2016). The Board is leaning heavily towards adopting the rule, which is a shame given Cal-OSHA’s more enlightened approach to regulating silica in construction and roofing in particular. Fed-OSHA’s silica rule is enormous compared to Cal-OSHA’s at 1,772 pages versus 3 pages. But, there are ample reasons to believe Cal-OSHA’s rule is “as effective” as the federal rule and should not be replaced.

CLICK HERE TO BECOME A MEMBER AND/OR CONTINUE READING... [gaevent src="https://rooferscoffeeshop.com/rcs.php?gaplg=601"]



Recommended For You


Comments

There are currently no comments here.

Leave a Reply

Commenting is only accessible to RCS users.

Have an account? Login to leave a comment!


Sign In
TAMKO - Banner Ad - FRSA 2026 Coffee Conversation Get Notified
Translate
Default
English
Español
Français

Sign Up for Our E-News!

Join over 18,000 other roofers who get the Week in Roofing for a recap of this week's best industry posts!

Sign Up
RCS -  Ad - Trends Survey 2026
Flash -  - Safety
Roofing Alliance - Future of Roofing -
TAMKO  - HailGuard- June -  Ad en Espanol
IKO -  - Dynasty
Contractor Outlook - Sponsored by SRS